“The fact that an architect from China has been selected by the jury represents a significant step in acknowledging the role that China will play in the development of architectural ideals,” Thomas J. Pritzker said in the prize announcement. “Over the coming decades China’s success at urbanization will be important to China and to the world. This urbanization, like urbanization around the world, needs to be in harmony with local needs and culture. China’s unprecedented opportunities for urban planning and design will want to be in harmony with both its long and unique traditions of the past and with its future needs for sustainable development.”
This is the second year in a row I haven’t known much about the Pritzker winner; part of this has to do with the fact that I don’t do a good job keeping up with international architecture news, and part of it simply has to do with the fact that the Pritzkers aren’t going to starchitects like Frank Gehry these days. The world of architecture has decided that it feels guilty for its decades of fawning and is now paying lip service to small-scale development and sustainable design and all that boring stuff.
That sounds pejorative, and it is meant to be, a little bit. However, I do like the work of both Eduardo Souto du Moura and Wang Shu; both deserve their prices.
Then again, so does Steven Holl.
Anyway, here’s a gallery of Shu’s works, here’s a somewhat informative blog post from the New Yorker magazine about reactions to his win, and here’s a video of Shu speaking on geometry and narrative in architecture (the video is like two hours long!):
And one other thing to remember: this prize is the one distributed by the family that discussed in the second part of this post, yeah, the family building the monstrous 50,000 square foot über-mansion overlooking LA. Take the prize with a grain of salt.